The last week of trading ended with two seismic events colliding in the same session: a US-Iran memorandum of understanding that cracked open the Strait of Hormuz, and a Fed debut from Chair Kevin Warsh that signaled rate hikes may be coming before year-end. Markets are closed today for Juneteenth — but the week's moves demand a full debrief. Thursday's session saw oil crash below $75 a barrel while stocks staged a sharp comeback, with the Nasdaq surging nearly 2% as the geopolitical relief trade overpowered Warsh's hawkish shock.
On Thursday, June 18 — the last trading day before the Juneteenth holiday — two macro earthquakes hit simultaneously. President Trump signed a 14-point US-Iran memorandum of understanding at the Palace of Versailles, committing both sides to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and enter 60 days of nuclear negotiations; WTI crude collapsed below $75, its lowest level since early March, erasing nearly all the war-premium gains since the conflict began in late February. At the same time, new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh delivered a hawkish debut at the FOMC: rates held at 3.50%–3.75% for the fourth straight meeting, but 9 of 18 participants now project at least one rate hike in 2026, the median dot rose to 3.8%, and the easing bias was stripped from the statement entirely. Markets initially sold off hard on Wednesday's Fed day — the S&P 500's worst Fed-day reaction since 1994 — but staged a sharp recovery Thursday, with the Nasdaq jumping 1.91% and the Russell 2000 surging 2.12% as the geopolitical relief trade overwhelmed rate fears. The 10-year Treasury yield held at 4.46%, and VIX dropped 11% to 16.40, signaling a return of near-term calm — but the structural questions on rates, oil supply, and inflation are far from settled heading into next week.
The United States and Iran formally signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding at Versailles, with President Trump and Iranian President Pezeshkian both affixing signatures. The MOU commits Iran to allow safe passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz for 60 days and opens the door to nuclear negotiations, with a $300 billion reconstruction plan for Iran and a phased removal of US sanctions. WTI crude dropped below $75 per barrel — its lowest since early March — as early signs of tanker traffic returned to the strait and Kuwait announced it would begin ramping production. Oil has now erased nearly all the gains recorded since the conflict began in late February.
Kevin Warsh presided over his first FOMC meeting as Fed Chair and held rates steady at 3.50%–3.75% — the fourth consecutive hold — but the dot plot was anything but steady. Nine of 18 participants now pencil in at least one rate hike for 2026, the median projected year-end rate rose to 3.8% (up from 3.4% in March), and the statement dropped all language referencing an easing bias. The Fed cited inflation running around 4.2% year-over-year and flagged energy supply shocks from the Middle East conflict as contributing factors. Stocks tanked Wednesday afternoon after the decision, with the S&P 500 suffering its worst Fed-day reaction under a new chair since 1994. Thursday's bounce was driven by the Iran deal overwhelming the Fed anxiety.
The S&P 500 closed at 7,500.58 (+1.08%), the Nasdaq at 26,517.93 (+1.91%), and the Russell 2000 at 2,979.77 (+2.12%), the outperformer of the day as small-caps caught a bid on the modest dip in yields. The Dow eked out a 72-point gain to 51,564.70 (+0.14%). Technology and cyclicals led the advance; energy stocks were the session's clear laggard as oil cratered. Markets are now closed for Juneteenth, with next trading on Monday, June 22.
From late February, when the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran and Tehran slammed shut the Strait of Hormuz, global oil markets were operating under a war premium that at one point pushed WTI above $106 per barrel. That premium is now effectively gone. The 14-point MOU signed at Versailles is not a final peace deal — critical issues including Iran's nuclear program, US sanctions, and frozen asset releases are all left for a 60-day negotiation window — but markets are pricing completion risk as manageable. Tankers that had been stranded for weeks began moving again. Kuwait signaled immediate production increases. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iraq could collectively restore millions of halted barrels if the Hormuz corridor normalizes. For energy traders and equity investors exposed to energy, the structural story shifted from supply scarcity to potential oversupply in a single session.
The Fed story is the mirror image. Coming into 2026, consensus was that Warsh — appointed by Trump — would lean dovish to support growth. He didn't. His debut statement was the shortest FOMC statement in years, stripped of forward guidance, and backed by a dot plot that showed half the committee in rate-hike territory. Goldman Sachs Asset Management's global fixed income co-head noted that even with the oil pullback, strong labor data and sticky core inflation kept the hawkish camp well-populated. The 2-year Treasury yield had spiked 11 basis points on Wednesday; by Thursday it stabilized near 4.20%, but the repricing of the rate path is durable. Markets are now fully pricing a rate hike by October.
The 10-year held at 4.46% despite the oil collapse, which tells you the bond market is treating the Warsh hawkish shift as the dominant signal. With half the dot plot pointing to a hike and the easing bias gone, the rate path is now asymmetric to the upside. The 2-year at 4.20% reflects markets fully pricing a move by October. Duration risk is back — and real.
The relief trade is powerful but narrow. Tech and semis can rally on lower energy input costs and a VIX collapse. But if the Fed follows through with a rate hike and the 10-year pushes toward 4.75%+, valuation multiples on long-duration growth names compress. The Nasdaq's nearly-2% bounce could be fragile if July CPI surprises to the upside.
Oil below $75 is a genuine consumer tailwind — think lower gas prices, lower freight costs, and a potential softening of headline CPI. But core inflation at 4.2% has been sticky independent of energy. A Hormuz reopening helps the supply side; it does not fix services inflation or wage pressure. The Fed knows this.
Three things on the radar for next week: (1) Any confirmation or complication on Iran implementing the Hormuz reopening. (2) Fed speakers — Warsh said little about the pace of future hikes; regional presidents will fill the vacuum. (3) June flash PMIs due Monday — a strong reading hardens the Warsh hike case immediately.
July FOMC meeting (July 28–29): If oil stays below $75 and CPI surprises down, Warsh may hold again. But if core inflation stays stuck above 4% and the labor market remains resilient, the committee's first hike since 2023 becomes the base case. The window between now and July 29 is the most important 40 days in Fed policy in years.
Chips led Thursday's recovery. Nvidia gained over 3% on the week as AI infrastructure spending narratives held firm. The Nasdaq's 1.91% single-session surge was tech-driven, with the Hormuz deal reducing energy input cost anxiety and the VIX collapse restoring risk appetite for high-multiple names. The sector bounced back from Wednesday's post-Fed selloff.
Energy was the week's clearest loser. The US-Iran MOU wiped out the conflict premium that had lifted oil above $106/barrel as recently as April. WTI below $75 compresses margins for E&P companies and signals a structural re-rating if Hormuz flows normalize. Integrated majors, tanker operators, and oilfield services stocks all saw significant selling pressure on the news.
A mixed picture. A hawkish Fed is theoretically good for net interest margins at banks — higher rates for longer means wider spreads. But JPMorgan fell nearly 2.5% on the week as investors weighed credit risk implications of a potential rate hike against a slowing economy. Watch regionals specifically: rate hike risk plus commercial real estate exposure creates a complex trade heading into Q2 earnings season.
This week is a master class in macro complexity — geopolitical de-escalation and monetary tightening happening simultaneously, pulling risk assets in opposite directions. The candidates who impress in interviews this summer are the ones who can explain why the Nasdaq went up even as the Fed signaled rate hikes. That tension is the whole story.
Clients with energy-heavy portfolios just had the trade reverse dramatically. The Hormuz MOU is a structural shift, not a headline blip — advisors need to be proactive about rebalancing conversations. At the same time, the Warsh dot-plot shift means fixed income positioning needs a fresh look: are clients overweight duration at a moment when a rate hike by October is now the market consensus? These two conversations — energy reweighting and rates repositioning — are the weekend agenda for relationship managers everywhere.
Two sector models just got stress-tested at once. Energy analysts need to revisit price deck assumptions — WTI at $74 changes the math on E&P valuations, free cash flow projections, and dividend sustainability. Tech analysts face the opposite question: does the rates repricing (October hike now priced) apply meaningful multiple compression to high-growth names, or does the AI capex story override the discount rate headwind? Writing a clear, well-reasoned sector note on either of these is exactly what separates junior analysts who just update models from those who generate insight.
The Hormuz deal will unblock a wave of delayed M&A and capital markets activity in the energy sector. Deals that were on hold amid commodity price uncertainty — LNG infrastructure, pipeline midstream, oilfield services roll-ups — are now back in play with a cleaner pricing environment. Simultaneously, a potential Fed rate hike compresses debt financing windows: borrowers who can access the high-yield market now, before October, have a clear incentive to move. Expect accelerated bond issuance calendars in the weeks ahead, which means live deal flow for anyone in DCM.
The Federal Reserve's "dot plot" is a chart published after each FOMC meeting showing each committee member's anonymous projection for where the federal funds rate should be at the end of each calendar year and over the longer run. Each dot represents one participant's view. It's not a commitment — it's a map of collective sentiment. This week's dot plot was the most watched in years: 9 of 18 participants placed their dot at or above 3.875%, signaling at least one rate hike in 2026. The median moved to 3.8% from 3.4% in March. Critically, one dot was missing — widely interpreted to be Chair Warsh, who withheld his individual projection, possibly signaling he objects to the tool itself as a communication device. When the dot plot moves, so does the bond market — the 2-year Treasury spiked 11 basis points on the news. Understanding how to read the dot plot is foundational for any fixed income, macro, or equities role.
"Two things happened at once that usually don't — oil cratered on the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and the Fed basically said a rate hike is back on the table for later this year. The market did something counterintuitive and rallied, because cheaper oil is a bigger near-term tailwind than the rate hike is a headwind. The real test comes in July when we see whether lower energy prices pull inflation down fast enough for the Fed to stay on hold — or whether core inflation stays sticky and Warsh pulls the trigger."